UK Parliament / Open data

Legal Services Bill [HL]

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Tuesday, 6 February 2007, in the House of Lords.
Legal Services Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage fourth day. Clauses 110 and 111 agreed to. Part 2 of 2 records.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

689 c682-700 

Session

2006-07

Department

Department for Constitutional Affairs

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Related items

Legal Services Bill (HL). In two volumes. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 9-EN also published.
Thursday, 23 November 2006
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Kingsland | 689 c697-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 110A: 110A: After Clause 111, insert the following new Clause— ““Regulatory ob...
Lord Kingsland | 689 c696 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 110: 110: Clause 110, page 60, line 9, at end insert— ““( ) Nothing in this Pa...

Show all contributions (28)
Lord Kingsland | 689 c695-6 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness made the point about the OLC being the initial recipient of a complaint; but I wo...
Lord Kingsland | 689 c697 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for her reply. I shall look at all the provisions to which ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c696-7 (Link to this contribution) I agree with the noble Lord that a complainant should not be prevented from making a claim on the La...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c693-4 (Link to this contribution) That is not how I see it from my perspective, if I may say so to the noble and learned Baroness. It ...
Baroness Butler-Sloss | 689 c693 (Link to this contribution) What is the difference in principle between buying in the expertise and delegating it? Why is it nec...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c695 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is correct; we are not making a distinction, because the Bill makes no distinction be...
Lord Kingsland | 689 c694-5 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Baroness for her reply, and I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. I was pleased...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c692-3 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure that I can give the noble Lord that specific information now but, of course, I shall d...
Lord Carlile of Berriew | 689 c692 (Link to this contribution) Can the noble Baroness tell the Committee whether the Government have made any cost comparison betwe...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c692 (Link to this contribution) I am very happy to give the noble Lord more detail on the cost-benefit analysis and I shall do so. H...
Lord Carlile of Berriew | 689 c686-7 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to my noble friend for telling everyone that; it is true. The point of this story, whi...
Baroness Butler-Sloss | 689 c684-5 (Link to this contribution) I support the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. He rather stole the words that I might have used, which I ...
Lord Carlile of Berriew | 689 c685-6 (Link to this contribution) I too support the amendments, other than those tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, which as I see...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c690-2 (Link to this contribution) This has been an interesting debate, eloquently put forward by noble Lords who have a great deal of ...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c692 (Link to this contribution) Did the cost-benefit analysis take into account redundancy at the current office? After all, it is n...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c687-9 (Link to this contribution) I, too, have appeared on behalf of a barrister before the Bar Council’s disciplinary proceedings. He...
Lord Borrie | 689 c689-90 (Link to this contribution) I, too, support the paving amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, and particularly his Amendme...
Lord Kingsland | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) Never let it be said that the Committee proceedings on this Bill have been engineered by a conspirac...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) When the noble Lord is thinking about this matter before Report, will he consider the possibility th...
Lord Kingsland | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) I accept that that could well be the way forward. Before the proceedings finish in this Chamber, I w...
Lord Grocott | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.
Lord Neill of Bladen | 689 c698 (Link to this contribution) I disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. He seems to base his proposition on the unstated ass...
Lord Borrie | 689 c698-9 (Link to this contribution) Briefly, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, has said. The impression given by the ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c699-700 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for all the contributions. The noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, reasonably refers us back t...
Lord Kingsland | 689 c682-4 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 109: 109: Clause 110, page 60, line 1, at beginning insert ““Subject to certai...

Subjects

Complaints
Disciplinary proceedings
Compensation
Legal profession
Misconduct
Ombudsman
Regulation
Solicitors
General Council of the Bar
Legal Services Board
Office for Legal Complaints

Legislation

Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07

Link

View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top