UK Parliament / Open data

Legal Services Bill [HL]

Briefly, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, has said. The impression given by the amendment is that the complainant is always right. That cannot be so, as he suggested. In any case, I have read Clause 1, dealing with the variety of objectives and different regulatory bodies, as meaning that the relevant board must follow those objectives relevant to its function; I hope that that is the correct reading. The objectives are set out in extenso, and I see no need for an elaborate and undesirable limitation exercise such as the amendment.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

689 c698-9 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top