UK Parliament / Open data

Violent Crime Reduction Bill

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Wednesday, 26 April 2006, in the House of Lords.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill. Lords Committee stage first day. Clauses 1-12 agreed to, Clauses 1,2,4,7,8 and 11 as amended. New clauses considered. Clause 13 under consideration. (Part 2 of 2)

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

681 c212-50 

Session

2005-06

Department

Home Office

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Violent Crime Reduction Bill. Brought from Commons Explanatory notes HL Bill 41-EN also published
Tuesday, 15 November 2005
Bills
House of Lords
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
Wednesday, 26 April 2006
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c238-9 (Link to this contribution) The amendments seek to create a right of appeal for licence holders against the designation of an al...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 681 c240 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, for his support. The noble Lord, Lord Bass...

Show all contributions (37)
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c239-40 (Link to this contribution) I take issue with the use of the word bureaucracy. This is not about setting up a bureaucracy but ab...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c243 (Link to this contribution) Clause 13 sets out criteria for designating an area as an alcohol disorder zone and specifies the st...
Lord Borrie | 681 c242-3 (Link to this contribution) The noble Viscount is a little unfair in using the word ““whim””. I cannot imagine a local authority...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c243-4 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry that the word ““whim”” did not find favour with the noble Lord, Lord Borrie. Perhaps ““su...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c241-2 (Link to this contribution) The amendments are devised—and I believe that the noble Viscount explained it this way—to get on the...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c240-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 72:"Page 11, line 25, at end insert—" ““(   )   Regulations made under subsect...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c242 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 74:"Page 11, line 37, leave out ““if they are”” and insert ““when the following ...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c242 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the Minister, who has obviously been as helpful as he can in the circumstances...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 681 c237-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 71:"Page 11, line 25, leave out paragraph (c)." The noble Baroness said: In mov...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 681 c237 (Link to this contribution) That is a very helpful addition. The Minister has, of course, taken us to task, saying that the Gove...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c237 (Link to this contribution) I should add that we would expect them to be party to the consultations, so they will have the oppor...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 681 c237 (Link to this contribution) I have always thought so highly of the noble Lord, Lord Dahrendorf, but I shall have to review my op...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c236-7 (Link to this contribution) I think that that is almost an admission of guilt. Anyway, it is not relevant. The intention behind...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c236 (Link to this contribution) I entirely agree with the amendment. There should be room for additional exemptions to be made to th...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 681 c235-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 66:"Page 11, line 1, leave out ““only””" The noble Baroness said: I shall speak...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c249 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry, I did not appreciate that Amendment No. 86 was grouped with it. That underlines what I s...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c250 (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 79 would place a duty on a local authority to publish the content of the proposed acti...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c246-7 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness is right that our discussion on alcohol disorder zones has fleshed out some impor...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 681 c245-6 (Link to this contribution) I will certainly want to consider carefully what the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, has said, but my immed...
Lord Borrie | 681 c245 (Link to this contribution) I will just refer to the words ““or near””, which is one part of what the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, h...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c244-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 75:"Page 11, line 38, after ““been”” insert ““persistent and repeated””" The no...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c249 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 79:"Page 12, line 1, after ““locality”” insert ““including the proposed content ...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c249 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for his response. I shall read what he said and consider the matter further. Fo...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c248 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord raises some important issues. Of course, one would not expect the licensees to contri...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c247-8 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may interrupt the noble Lord and try to deal with the illustration given by the noble Lord...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c249 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, did not speak to Amendment No. 86, but I am assuming that h...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c249 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment because the proposal to designate the locality will be served by way of a no...
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 681 c231-3 (Link to this contribution) The Bill provides for an exemption from the compulsory charge at Clause 12(6). A premises of which t...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c231 (Link to this contribution) I speak to Amendments Nos. 68 and 69, which attempt to deal with the same problem, but perhaps from ...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c250 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the Minister. At least he has taken on the intention behind the amendment. We ...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c250 (Link to this contribution) The Minister has spoken in such a way that if there was a failure to consult, application for judici...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c234-5 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the support from the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and to the Minister for ...
Viscount Bridgeman | 681 c230-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 64:"Page 10, line 27, at end insert ““, provided that no charges shall be payabl...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c238 (Link to this contribution) We strongly support the introduction of a proper appeals system on the face of the Bill. It should b...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 681 c233-4 (Link to this contribution) : The Minister talks about practicality. I have two main points. First, since the Minister was invol...
Back to top