Procurement Bill [HL]
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
823 cc181-234GC Session
2022-23Legislative stage
Committee stageChamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeRelated items
Wednesday, 8 June 2022
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Show all related items (6)
Proceeding contributions
Moved by
The Minister of State, Cabinet Office (Lord True) (Con)
1: Before Clause 1, ...
My Lords, in moving Amendment 1 I will speak to the first group of amendments. Before so doing, I...
Show all contributions (78)
I realise it is unusual to intervene on the opening speech, but it may be for the convenience of ...
My Lords, I will have to be advised on that. I have been advised that they are the result of disc...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his apology at the beginning, which I believe to be sincere an...
We have not received it.
I will correct my speech. It has not even been received by all the interested parties, which make...
My Lords, where do I start? This is a really important and long-awaited Bill, so it is incredibly...
My Lords, I am the bearer of a simpler brain than the noble Baroness, so I may not cast too much ...
I found the explanation of the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, quite interesting, but whether he is cor...
My Lords, I will speak briefly, as I intervened on the Minister’s opening speech. I want to reinf...
Scotland may come in but, at the moment, it is doing its own thing. This is a matter of getting a...
My Lords, I regret I was unable to participate in Second Reading. However, I followed that debate...
My Lords, I totally agree with everything that has been said. The rubric “technical amendments” h...
My Lords, I apologise for not having spoken at Second Reading. I have taken a keen interest in th...
My Lords, I do not want to prolong the debate. I must say that, having spent the weekend worrying...
My Lords, I want to raise a question about the wording of the definition in Amendment 1. I am tro...
My Lords, I am grateful to all those who have spoken, although I cannot say it always made for th...
My understanding is that the only way this could be done better is for the Government to withdraw...
That was, in a sense, the implication of what I was saying. We are debating only Amendment 1 at t...
I think the problem may be in the language of paragraph (b), because it does not fulfil what the ...
My Lords, I listened carefully to the noble and learned Lord’s remarks. We will take them away. I...
I am sorry to interrupt my noble friend, but I am glad that I was not misdirecting myself.
...
I do not think that, in public remarks that will be recorded for all eternity in Hansard, Ministe...
While the Minister is reflecting, might he be able to comment today on the legal advice that he h...
My Lords, I was going to make a proposal. The legislation obviously reflects our existing interna...
I thank the Minister for that. I do not think he answered the question my noble friend asked. Acc...
I will have to take procedural advice on that. My understanding is that if I withdraw Amendment 1...
I hate to interrupt the noble Lord in full flow, but a Division has been called in the Chamber.
In order to finish, as I was just about say, we wish to facilitate proper discussion. Obviously, ...
Moved by
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
2: Clause 1, page 1, line 10, leave out sub-paragraph...
My Lords, I am glad that we have been able to move on to this group of amendments, all of which w...
My Lords, I added my name to Amendment 2, and tabled Amendments 25 to 27. The noble Baroness rais...
My Lords, I hesitate to appear to disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Berkely, but I shall humilia...
I think electricity is later taken out, as I mentioned.
Oh well. I shall just work on the text I have; I mean, what is one meant to do? There is “Water” ...
I am grateful to the noble Lord for expanding fully on these amendments but in the case of some o...
Since that is technically an interruption to my speech—
No, I am delighted. It adds much illumination.
We can have more of you.
You could have more of me, my Lords, but I will simply say that I know nothing about ports. Howev...
My Lords, this is my first intervention on the Bill because on the day of Second Reading I was co...
My Lords, I am sure the Minister will pick up on the noble Earl’s Voltaire reference and tell us ...
My Lords, this has been an interesting debate. It has been interesting to listen to comments on t...
My Lords, it has been an interesting and important debate, which we will reflect on as we go forw...
Can the Minister clarify what an appropriate authority is? Who are the appropriate authorities an...
I was asked that at Second Reading. An appropriate authority is a Minister of the Crown or a Wels...
I think that my noble friend is approaching his peroration. May I ask him for a little clarity? T...
My noble friend has very characteristically not only picked up an onion but begun to peel it into...
I sense that the Minister is winding. I have a quick question, which I think is best responded to...
Yes, my Lords. I have committed to write in relation to that and I will pick up other questions t...
My Lords, this has been a workmanlike discussion, the unpeeling of the onion—the first of many un...
Moved by
Lord Lansley
3: Clause 1, page 1, line 21, at end insert—
“(3A) A univ...
My Lords, I am glad to have the opportunity, by way of Amendment 3, to probe—I think it is litera...
My Lords, I have a number of probing amendments in this group and throughout the Bill. The majori...
I shall finish by offering a comment on another amendment in this group. Amendment 5, in the name...
I am delighted to follow my noble friend with a few brief remarks. I say at the outset that I reg...
My Lords, up to her final couple of sentences, I was going to recommend that the Minister listen ...
My Lords, I shall speak on this set of amendments, particularly Amendment 42. It is the first tim...
My Lords, I very much welcome the question of the noble Lord, Lord Scriven, about local authoriti...
My Lords, I shall speak to my Amendment 7. I do not think I need comment on any of the other amen...
My Lords, my name is on some of these amendments. My colleagues have spoken to several of them so...
My Lords, I shall speak to my Amendment 19 and comment very briefly, because it was a pleasure to...
My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow my noble friend Lady Hayman after her remarks. I apologise t...
Again, my Lords, I am very grateful to all those who have spoken. There have been some interestin...
Can I just point out that the grouping comes from the Government Whips’ Office? We could have ext...
My Lords, they are negotiated in the usual channels. Sometimes it is a fatal thing in your Lordsh...
I am grateful. Just so that the Minister writes the correct letter to me, I am fully aware that s...
I was actually coming on to the rest of that but, with respect, the noble Lord asked me a specifi...
My Lords, I suggest looking at the definitions in Clause 112. I note that the terms “central gove...
I will certainly reflect on anything that is said in Committee. “Combined authority” has a partic...
It is a federal question that I am asking, about states that border combined authorities.
I am not sure that the First Minister is looking for a federation.
Where a procurement is b...
I was delighted that the noble Lord, Lord Coaker, was able to pursue some of things that I touche...
My Lords, we need the Bill because we need a national procurement structure. I hear what my noble...
My noble friend should not feel he has to apologise for responding to colleagues in Committee who...