My understanding is that the only way this could be done better is for the Government to withdraw the amendments and bring them back with explanatory statements. Explanatory statement cannot be tabled separately, so if the Minister is sincere that the Committee will not face continuing lists of government amendments without explanatory statements, the sensible course of action would be for him to withdraw them and bring them back with explanatory statements so that we can consider them properly.
Procurement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Purvis of Tweed
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Procurement Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c197GC Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-07-25 18:17:31 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-04/22070455000021
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-04/22070455000021
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-04/22070455000021