UK Parliament / Open data

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Wednesday, 10 November 2021, in the House of Lords.
Lords committee stage seventh day. Clauses 96 to 115 agreed to, with clause 107 agreed to as amended. Schedules 10 and 11 agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

815 cc1771-1836 

Session

2021-22

Department

Ministry of Justice

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill 2019-21 to 2021-22. Brought from the Commons.
Tuesday, 6 July 2021
Bills
House of Lords
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill
Wednesday, 10 November 2021
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2021-0918
Monday, 22 November 2021
Deposited papers
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Paddick | 815 c1771 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Paddick

187: Clause 96, page 84, leave out line 18

Member’s expla...

Lord Paddick | 815 cc1771-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 187 in my name I will speak to the other amendments in this group. ...


Show all contributions (87)
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede | 815 cc1772-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, is to retain simple cautions. The exam...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1773-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is fair to say that this group of amendments goes to the heart of why reform to out ...

Baroness Chakrabarti | 815 cc1774-5 (Link to this contribution)

Does the Minister not agree that good law is about a combination of rules and discretion? I quite...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1775 (Link to this contribution)

Without turning this afternoon into a jurisprudential seminar, I certainly agree with the thrust ...

Lord Paddick | 815 c1775 (Link to this contribution)

Can the Minister clarify something? I think he said something along the lines that the lowest lev...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1775 (Link to this contribution)

As I said a moment ago, this relates to Clause 80(4) and Clause 89(4), if the noble Lord looks at...

Baroness Chakrabarti | 815 cc1775-6 (Link to this contribution)

Forgive me, but I sense an element of unworldliness about this. If it is appropriate in a given c...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1776 (Link to this contribution)

May I first deal with the caution points? I do not want to run those two topics together. On caut...

Lord Paddick | 815 cc1776-7 (Link to this contribution)

I thank noble Lords who have participated in this short debate and am grateful for the qualified ...

Lord Paddick | 815 c1777 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Paddick

189ZA: Schedule 10, page 231, line 15, leave out sub-paragraphs...

Lord Paddick | 815 cc1777-8 (Link to this contribution)

Forgive me for the delay, my Lords—so many amendments, so little time, as it were.

I am gra...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 815 cc1778-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the noble Lord’s amendment. If I may, I will elasticate the rules of order sl...

Baroness Butler-Sloss | 815 c1779 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very interested in what the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, has just said. Although, aga...

Baroness Chakrabarti | 815 cc1779-1780 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have to agree with the three Members of the Committee who have just spoken. I will de...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1780 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will make a very brief point in support of what has just been said by the noble Baron...

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede | 815 cc1780-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, for tabling his amendment. As we have seen throug...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1781-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, first, I will pick up one point from the last group to make it very clear: if I have ma...

Lord Paddick | 815 c1783 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Carlile of Berriew, for talking beyond the amendment, in t...

Baroness Massey of Darwen | 815 c1783 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Massey of Darwen

191: Clause 101, page 86, line 14, leave out from ...

Baroness Massey of Darwen | 815 cc1784-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak to amendments of various kinds in this group, all related to youth justic...

Lord German | 815 cc1787-8 (Link to this contribution)

I will speak to the issues raised in these amendments. In summing up the last group of amendments...

Bishop of Durham | 815 cc1788-1790 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I speak on behalf of the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Derby on this occasion, w...

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb | 815 c1790 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Massey, on tabling these amendments. I will spe...

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede | 815 c1791 (Link to this contribution)

I thank my noble friend Lady Massey for introducing these amendments. She did so comprehensively,...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1791-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, these amendments, which I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Massey, for putting d...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1792 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend clearly is right when he says that this is not a mandatory sentence, but does he ...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1792 (Link to this contribution)

The purpose of a minimum sentence is that unless the threshold is met—we will debate in another g...

Baroness Chakrabarti | 815 c1792 (Link to this contribution)

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister but in sentencing law and in the criminal justice system, mi...

Bishop of Durham | 815 c1792 (Link to this contribution)

That is exactly what it says in the paperwork we have.

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1792 (Link to this contribution)

The point I am making is very important and we will get to it in another group. I absolutely acce...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1793 (Link to this contribution)

What is the essential difference in my noble friend’s mind between exceptional and particular cir...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1793 (Link to this contribution)

As I say, there is a specific amendment on that point, so I will come to this in more detail then...

Baroness Kingsmill | 815 c1793 (Link to this contribution)

Is the Minister saying therefore that it will be a mandatory sentence unless there are exceptions...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1793 (Link to this contribution)

Unless the exception is met, this is the sentence that will be imposed. I do not want to split ha...

Baroness Kingsmill | 815 c1793 (Link to this contribution)

It is awfully important in these kinds of cases that we are very clear and precise in our languag...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1793 (Link to this contribution)

It is not a mandatory sentence, because you can impose more. Let us be clear: it is a minimum sen...

Baroness Chakrabarti | 815 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

I am so sorry to elongate this, but it is important. The Minister, sitting in a Government with a...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

I am really not sure that we are saying anything different. As I said, we will come in a later gr...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

That is out of the ordinary. It is a high threshold.

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

I will come in a moment to the word “exceptional” as I think that was the point made by the noble...

Lord Beith | 815 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

I wonder if the Minister could be a little clearer. A moment ago he cited figures for the number ...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1795-7 (Link to this contribution)

I am certainly not critical of any particular sentence passed in any particular case. What I do t...

Lord German | 815 c1797 (Link to this contribution)

Can the noble Lord tell me the difference, then, between the current words, which are “particular...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1797-8 (Link to this contribution)

I hear the words, “higher bar”. I do not disagree that “exceptional circumstances” is a stricter ...

Baroness Massey of Darwen | 815 cc1798-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response. I did not quite realise it would end up in a dis...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 815 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames

192A: Clause 101, page 86, line 20, leave out...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 815 cc1799-1801 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, all the amendments in this group are in my name and that of the noble Lord, Lord Pannic...

Lord Judge | 815 cc1801-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I sometimes wonder when I read statutes that make provision for sentencing whether thos...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1803 (Link to this contribution)

I support the amendment proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Marks, for very much the same reasons ad...

Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd | 815 cc1803-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in the light of what my predecessor as Lord Chief Justice, the noble and learned Lord, ...

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede | 815 c1804 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this has been an interesting debate. I agree with the points that the noble Lord, Lord ...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1804-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, these amendments seek to ensure that the courts depart from imposing a minimum sentence...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 815 cc1806-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful for the speeches that we have heard in this interesting debate, particula...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 c1807 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Falconer of Thoroton

195: After Clause 101, insert the following new Cl...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 cc1807-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this group contains three amendments in my name, and a Clause 103 stand part debate in ...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1808 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have a feeling I am going to be in a minority in this Committee. As much as I like an...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 c1808 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Viscount may be assuaged by the fact that what I am talking about is the starting point...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1808 (Link to this contribution)

We have been here before in previous debates. The effect is to make it mandatory unless there are...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 815 cc1810-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we have heard which amendments are in this slightly disparate group. On Amendment 195, ...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 815 c1811 (Link to this contribution)

The only reason I make that point is that there was a misunderstanding—not inherent in the noble ...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1811-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this is obviously an important set of amendments. I thank all those who spoke on the ar...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 c1815 (Link to this contribution)

I am obliged to everybody who took part in the debate. There was widespread support around the Co...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 c1815 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Falconer of Thoroton

196A: After Clause 101, insert the following new C...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 c1816 (Link to this contribution)

This is about a completely new topic that we have not addressed before, which is the unduly lenie...

Baroness Brinton | 815 cc1816-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am pleased to support the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer, on Amendments 196A t...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1818-1820 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the amendments all refer to the unduly lenient sentence scheme, which is set out in Sec...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 cc1820-1 (Link to this contribution)

I express my gratitude to the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and, through her, to the noble Barone...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1821 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

205: Clause 107, page 94, line 36, leave out “may b...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1821-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this is a drafting amendment to Clause 107. Its purpose, as I hope has been explained, ...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 815 c1822 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we support these amendments. It is obviously right to remove the retrospection and we c...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1822 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

207: Clause 107, page 95, line 24, leave out “may b...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 815 cc1822-5 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Carlile of Berriew

208: Clause 109, leave out Clause 109 and insert the...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 815 cc1825-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment stands in my name and the names of other noble Lords. In one way, this a...

Lord German | 815 cc1828-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have added my name to this amendment not because of its length but because of its imp...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 cc1830-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the purpose of this proposed new clause. It is highly desirable that there sh...

Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 815 cc1831-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this is a very interesting proposal. I think we all agree, across the House, that where...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1832-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we have had a very interesting debate. The last few speeches have highlighted the probl...

Lord German | 815 c1833 (Link to this contribution)

That was a good statement of intent. When do the Government expect to be able to produce that? Wo...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 c1833 (Link to this contribution)

I do not want to give an incorrect answer to the noble Lord. I know that there are different code...

Viscount Hailsham | 815 c1833 (Link to this contribution)

On a related point—the obligation on the Secretary of State to give reasons—how detailed should t...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 815 cc1833-4 (Link to this contribution)

I have said that we will publish the principles which underpin the Secretary of State’s decision....

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 815 cc1834-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very grateful to those who have intervened in this debate. I pay particular tribut...

Back to top