Nuclear Safeguards Bill
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
788 cc2022-2064 Session
2017-19Legislative stage
Second readingChamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberRelated items
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
My Lords, before I set out the context surrounding, and the key features of, the Nuclear Safeguar...
I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, but this issue was raised recently in the EU Energy and Env...
Show all contributions (40)
My Lords, I will take advice but my understanding is that the IAEA does not have concerns about t...
This part of the noble Lord’s speech suggests that it is a given that we are leaving Euratom, and...
My Lords, I do not think that the noble Lord has been following what has been happening in this H...
Yes, my Lords, we are leaving Euratom. That is the case, and the simple fact is that we have to m...
The noble Lord says that what I have said is not true. I would ask that he withdraw that remark. ...
I will withdraw that particular remark which used the words, “not true”, but if we stay in the Eu...
My Lords, Euratom consists of the 28 members of the EU and no others. There are two countries whi...
I am grateful to the noble Lord for what he has just said, but are we to take it that the sentenc...
My Lords, it is exactly the same as what I have said—as part of our broader negotiations we will ...
I did not quite understand what the noble Lord was saying in his attempts to reassure us about Eu...
It is a body set up by Euratom for Euratom, therefore it has an interest in ensuring safe export ...
I do not think that that answers the point. The noble Lord is saying that they will go on helping...
I have a sneaking suspicion that the noble Lord is deliberately misunderstanding me. What I am tr...
My Lords, there are indeed many concerns. I have yet to hear any principled criticisms regarding ...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his very tolerant and understanding introduction. I congratula...
My Lords, I welcome this Bill, and I am glad that it is shorter and clearer than most other compa...
My Lords, the purpose of this Bill, Brexit notwithstanding, is to try to sustain the confidence o...
My Lords, I thank the Minister, particularly for his explanation at the beginning, not least that...
My Lords, given that I intend to address my remarks to the issue of medical isotopes, I am gratef...
My Lords, my noble friend Lord O’Neill referred to the Bill as an unfortunate necessity, but it i...
My Lords, I realised when I saw my position in the batting order here that most of what I was goi...
My Lords, first, I will refer again briefly to the question I raised in my earlier intervention a...
My Lords, I have been around government as a civil servant, special adviser, Minister and parliam...
My Lords, I should declare a couple of interests. I am a member of the Cumbria Trust, which has c...
My Lords, I actually find it encouraging to see this important Bill arriving in your Lordship’s H...
My Lords, the Nuclear Safeguards Bill is slim by the standards of Brexit Bills, but this belies t...
My Lords, I speak briefly in the gap as some months ago I advocated, rather along the lines of so...
My Lords, this has been a very interesting debate, somewhat more interesting than I expected give...
My Lords, in one sense the Minister was right when he described this as a technical Bill. Somethi...
My Lords, I will come to the Henry VIII powers later, and I am grateful that the noble Lord feels...
Just before I give way to the noble Lord, I remind the House that I gave way six times in the cou...
I was going to pick up a totally fresh point that has just been made, but if the noble Lord does ...
My Lords, I am always more than happy to take interventions. As I said, I took a total of six in ...
It is a very simple point. The noble Lord has made a fresh point along the lines that we have no ...
I said nothing of the sort. I hope that the noble Lord will look very carefully at what I said. I...