UK Parliament / Open data

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

Debate on bills on Tuesday, 4 February 2014, in the House of Commons.
Programme motion (No. 3) on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendment 112 disagreed to on division (292 to 239). Amendment in lieu, agreed to on division (297 to 238). Lords amendments 1-88, and 90-111 and 113-180, agreed to on question with amendment 89 agreed to, with Commons financial privileges waived.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

575 cc162-206 

Session

2013-14

Department

Home Office

Legislative stage

Lords amendments

Procedure

Programme motions

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill 2013-14. Lords amendments.
Monday, 27 January 2014
Bills
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Laing of Elderslie | 575 c163 (Link to this contribution)

I must draw the House’s attention to the fact that financial privilege is involved in Lords amend...

Damian Green | 575 c163 (Link to this contribution)

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 112.


Show all contributions (93)
Baroness Laing of Elderslie | 575 c163 (Link to this contribution)

With this is will be convenient to take Government amendment (a) in lieu of Lords amendment 112.<...

Damian Green | 575 cc163-4 (Link to this contribution)

I should add that I wish the House to agree to amendment (a).

Clause 151 defines what amoun...

Julian Huppert | 575 c164 (Link to this contribution)

Will the Minister explain to those of us who are not lawyers what the difference is between the G...

Damian Green | 575 c164 (Link to this contribution)

I join my hon. Friend in that state of grace of not being a lawyer. The difference is that we hav...

John McDonnell | 575 c164 (Link to this contribution)

Will the Minister therefore explain to us what the difference is between “innocent of” and “did n...

Damian Green | 575 c164 (Link to this contribution)

A lot of the debate was about the nomenclature—the thought that we were asking people to prove th...

Mark Durkan | 575 c164 (Link to this contribution)

Further to that point, will the Minister explain how it would be different for someone to prove t...

Damian Green | 575 c165 (Link to this contribution)

The point is that nobody has to prove that they are innocent. We are not requiring them to do tha...

Hywel Williams | 575 c165 (Link to this contribution)

Will the Minister concede that that puts the burden of proof squarely on the defendant, however? ...

Damian Green | 575 c165 (Link to this contribution)

No, I do not accept that because what would trigger the compensation claim would be the new evide...

Jeremy Corbyn | 575 c165 (Link to this contribution)

If an innocent bystander is watching this debate today and the Minister is saying they have to pr...

Damian Green | 575 c165 (Link to this contribution)

I am keen on this new version and consider it to be an improvement on the original version precis...

David Davis | 575 c165 (Link to this contribution)

I assure the Minister I have not risen to intervene to ensure he takes an intervention from every...

Damian Green | 575 cc165-6 (Link to this contribution)

It would not be helpful to go into individual cases. I have given some examples of what requireme...

John McDonnell | 575 c166 (Link to this contribution)

I think I understand where the Minister is coming from, but I just think we are getting ourselves...

Damian Green | 575 c166 (Link to this contribution)

I disagree. The hon. Gentleman seems to be saying the system will in some ways be more difficult ...

John McDonnell | 575 c166 (Link to this contribution)

May I explain my point again? Let us take the Birmingham Six as our example. As soon as the confe...

Damian Green | 575 c166 (Link to this contribution)

I think this is just a genuine misunderstanding. Someone will be eligible for compensation if the...

Damian Green | 575 c166 (Link to this contribution)

The hon. Gentleman has had a go.

David Burrowes | 575 c166 (Link to this contribution)

I must declare an interest as a lawyer. Returning to the amendment, these matters must be dealt w...

Damian Green | 575 c167 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for bringing his legal mind to bear on this, and explaining the d...

Damian Green | 575 cc167-8 (Link to this contribution)

The hon. Gentleman may disagree, but he will have his chance to contribute to the debate.

W...

Mark Durkan | 575 c168 (Link to this contribution)

Surely the Government’s amendment would not make it easier for the applicant to decide. Would not...

Damian Green | 575 c168 (Link to this contribution)

No; my difference with the Lords amendment is that it would leave applicants less clear about wha...

Jack Dromey | 575 cc168-170 (Link to this contribution)

Justice demands that those who are guilty of serious offences should be held to account and broug...

Rehman Chishti | 575 c169 (Link to this contribution)

The hon. Gentleman talks about the issue of innocence and the test that is to be applied. Like me...

Jack Dromey | 575 c169 (Link to this contribution)

First, the number of people who receive compensation every year is a handful—it is less than the ...

David Burrowes | 575 c169 (Link to this contribution)

I share the hon. Gentleman’s concern about the cases he has cited and the appalling years that th...

Jack Dromey | 575 c169 (Link to this contribution)

In English law, someone is innocent until they are proved guilty. Let me contrast the three diffe...

David Burrowes | 575 c169 (Link to this contribution)

We are talking about where the burden lies so we are dealing with the difference between a test o...

Jack Dromey | 575 c171 (Link to this contribution)

As a lawyer, the hon. Gentleman will know the difference between providing conclusive proof and p...

Jeremy Corbyn | 575 c171 (Link to this contribution)

Is not the Barry George example one we should think about carefully? He was convicted and spent a...

Jack Dromey | 575 c171 (Link to this contribution)

There is a widespread view, reflected in the debate in the other place—someone talked about “incr...

David Burrowes | 575 c171 (Link to this contribution)

We all want clarity, so let me try to understand the difference between “conclusively” and “beyon...

Jack Dromey | 575 c171 (Link to this contribution)

As an eminent lawyer, the hon. Gentleman will know that “beyond reasonable doubt” has a very clea...

Jack Dromey | 575 c171 (Link to this contribution)

We believe it is inappropriate for the test to be pitched so high; a “beyond reasonable doubt” te...

Jack Dromey | 575 cc172-3 (Link to this contribution)

I have given way three times and have been more than happy to do so, but let me continue now.

...
John McDonnell | 575 cc173-4 (Link to this contribution)

To be frank, I am absolutely confused about where we have got to. I am confused over the differen...

John McDonnell | 575 c174 (Link to this contribution)

Let me just finish this point, then I will give way; I welcome the intervention.

In the cas...

Mark Field | 575 c174 (Link to this contribution)

I must admit that I have quite a lot of sympathy with what the hon. Gentleman is saying. He expre...

John McDonnell | 575 cc174-5 (Link to this contribution)

In my view, the Government’s test is faulty. I am not convinced of the need for this additional t...

Mark Durkan | 575 cc175-8 (Link to this contribution)

I rise to support Lords amendment 112 and oppose the Government’s amendment in lieu. The Minister...

Hywel Williams | 575 cc176-180 (Link to this contribution)

I wish to add my voice to those seeking to support Lords amendment 112. I am indebted to my right...

Jeremy Corbyn | 575 cc180-1 (Link to this contribution)

I rise to support Opposition Front Benchers. Lords amendment 112 uses the words,

“conclusiv...

Damian Green | 575 cc181-2 (Link to this contribution)

With the leave of the House, Madam Deputy Speaker, I will respond briefly to some of the importan...

Jack Dromey | 575 c182 (Link to this contribution)

Just for the record, Lord Saville of Newdigate, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Hope of Cr...

Damian Green | 575 cc182-3 (Link to this contribution)

I should point out that Lord Brown disagreed and that the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Adams c...

Norman Baker | 575 c183 (Link to this contribution)

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendments 1 to 68, 138 and 168.

Lindsay Hoyle | 575 c183 (Link to this contribution)

Order. The House is agreeing with Lords amendment 1 only, with which we will consider Lords amend...

Norman Baker | 575 c183 (Link to this contribution)

Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, I am so keen to agree that I got carried away.

The amendments...

Jim Shannon | 575 c183 (Link to this contribution)

I do not take exception to the Minister’s comments, but those of religious persuasion who are con...

Norman Baker | 575 c192 (Link to this contribution)

Yes, I am happy to deal with the issue of religious beliefs. Lords amendments 2 and 19 respond to...

Mark Field | 575 c192 (Link to this contribution)

While I agree with the Minister that we should agree with what the Lords have had to say on this ...

Norman Baker | 575 cc192-3 (Link to this contribution)

I am not quite sure what was in the Lords thoughts. Other examples were given—bellringers and so ...

Helen Jones | 575 c193 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister for outlining how the Government do not intend to oppose the Lords ...

Mark Field | 575 c193 (Link to this contribution)

I think the hon. Lady is being too sceptical about the genesis of these provisions. As a central ...

Helen Jones | 575 cc193-4 (Link to this contribution)

The hon. Gentleman makes the important point that in many cases ASBOs worked. I have seen them wo...

Jim Shannon | 575 c194 (Link to this contribution)

I sympathise greatly and understand the issue that the hon. Lady raises. In the case of someone a...

Helen Jones | 575 cc194-5 (Link to this contribution)

The hon. Gentleman makes a fair point. He is right that incidents of domestic violence do not alw...

Julie Hilling | 575 c195 (Link to this contribution)

Before my hon. Friend sits down, will she say whether she, like me, welcomes Lords amendment 69, ...

Helen Jones | 575 c195 (Link to this contribution)

My hon. Friend makes a good point. I well recall the horrific case in her constituency. I do regr...

Julian Huppert | 575 cc195-6 (Link to this contribution)

There is a huge range of issues to cover in this group of amendments. I will not even try to touc...

Julian Huppert | 575 c196 (Link to this contribution)

I hope my hon. Friend would join me in being in the annoying category.

Lindsay Hoyle | 575 c196 (Link to this contribution)

Order. I think we go through the Chair.

Julian Huppert | 575 c196 (Link to this contribution)

I was somewhat surprised by the original amendment passed in the other place, which was backed by...

Jack Dromey | 575 c196 (Link to this contribution)

Just for the record, the proposal for a tenure-neutral approach in fact came from Labour Lords.

Julian Huppert | 575 cc196-8 (Link to this contribution)

I do not have the list of exactly who proposed what. The Government amendment we have is neutral;...

Mark Field | 575 cc198-9 (Link to this contribution)

I agree with the hon. Member for Cambridge (Dr Huppert) that it is a shame that the Government di...

Richard Drax | 575 cc199-200 (Link to this contribution)

I will not detain the House for long. I want to touch briefly on the dangerous dogs element of th...

Richard Fuller | 575 cc200-1 (Link to this contribution)

It is a pleasure to follow my hon. Friend the Member for South Dorset (Richard Drax), because I a...

Norman Baker | 575 cc201-2 (Link to this contribution)

With the leave of the House, Mr Deputy Speaker, I will respond to some of the points that have be...

Helen Jones | 575 c202 (Link to this contribution)

That was precisely my concern; I fear that it is difficult to prove a grooming offence, because o...

Norman Baker | 575 cc202-3 (Link to this contribution)

I am happy to keep anything like that under review. Everyone in this House shares a dislike of an...

Richard Drax | 575 c203 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful to the Minister for answering my question. If the Crown Prosecution Service de...

Norman Baker | 575 c203 (Link to this contribution)

On the face of it, if no offence has been committed or pursued, there is no case to answer. Howev...

Helen Jones | 575 c203 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister, who is being generous in giving way. If the Government accept that...

Norman Baker | 575 c203 (Link to this contribution)

The Opposition, as we saw during their time in government, appear to believe that the

David Hamilton | 575 c204 (Link to this contribution)

Will we have continuity? What discussions has the Minister had with the devolved Parliaments to e...

Norman Baker | 575 c204 (Link to this contribution)

We and my officials have regular discussions with the devolved Administrations on this and other ...

Norman Baker | 575 c205 (Link to this contribution)

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 113.

Lindsay Hoyle | 575 c205 (Link to this contribution)

With this it will be convenient to take Lords amendments 114 to 180.

Norman Baker | 575 cc205-6 (Link to this contribution)

I will not repeat the numbers, in case I get that wrong, but these are the main amendments to the...

Back to top