We all want clarity, so let me try to understand the difference between “conclusively” and “beyond reasonable doubt”. Are we talking about a balance of probabilities—whether something is more likely than not? Or are we talking about proving something beyond reasonable doubt, so that people are satisfied and sure? Is “conclusively” a balance of probabilities test, a beyond reasonable doubt test or something else? If it is something else, that wording does not provide the clarity we all seek.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Burrowes
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 4 February 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
575 c171 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-02-05 14:44:34 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-02-04/14020474000223
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-02-04/14020474000223
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-02-04/14020474000223