There is a widespread view, reflected in the debate in the other place—someone talked about “incredulity”—as to why the Government are introducing such a test. A statutory definition providing greater clarity, particularly in the light of some of the cases that have gone before the courts, is one thing, but making it more difficult for people to receive compensation for serious miscarriages of justice is something altogether different. As the Barry George case shows, very few people are receiving compensation. The fear expressed in the other place is that the Government’s proposals will make it yet more difficult to obtain compensation for a miscarriage of justice.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Jack Dromey
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 4 February 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
575 c171 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-02-05 14:44:34 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-02-04/14020474000222
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-02-04/14020474000222
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-02-04/14020474000222