Pensions Bill. Lords Third reading debate. Amendment 1 to insert a new Clause debated and agreed to on division (141 votes to 138). Bill passed on question and returned to the Commons with amendments.
Pensions Bill
Debate on bills on Wednesday, 11 July 2007,
in the House of Lords,
led by Lord McKenzie of Luton.
The answering
member was Lord Skelmersdale.
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
693 c1408-23 Session
2006-07Legislative stage
Third readingChamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberRelated items
Proceeding contributions
Lord Grocott | 693 c1408 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty, ha...
Lord Fowler | 693 c1408 (Link to this contribution)
moved Amendment No. 1:
1: Insert the following new clause-
““Post-legislative scrutiny
Four years ...
Show all contributions (17)
Lord Fowler | 693 c1409-11 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I beg both noble Lords’ pardon.
I have never had so much trouble in trying to persuade th...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 693 c1413-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I am delighted to give the official support of these Benches to the amendment tabled by th...
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 693 c1414-5 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I shall not be supporting the amendment, but I have lot of sympathy with both the proposal...
Lord Norton of Louth | 693 c1411-2 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I strongly support my noble friend’s amendment introducing a new clause. Both government a...
Lord Skelmersdale | 693 c1412-3 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, if your Lordships have any doubts about my claim on Report that my noble friend Lord Fowle...
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 693 c1417 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I have one small point to add to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, abou...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 693 c1417-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I rather hoped that we could end with consensus across the House on this last amendment. W...
Baroness Howe of Idlicote | 693 c1416-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I was very impressed by what I heard about post-legislative scrutiny as an instrument in m...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 693 c1422-3 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I beg to move that this Bill do now pass. In doing so, perhaps I may take the opportunity ...
Lord Skelmersdale | 693 c1423 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, on behalf of, I hope, the whole House, I thank the Minister very much for his constructive...
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 693 c1423 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lord Oakeshott, I, too, thank the noble Lord for all his pati...
Lord Fowler | 693 c1419 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, frankly, that is one of the more disappointing replies that I have heard. If it convinces ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 693 c1419 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, can the noble Lord be a bit more explicit about what he thinks post-legislative scrutiny i...
Lord Fowler | 693 c1419-20 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, with great respect to the Minister, I set that out in my initial remarks—I do not know whe...
Baroness Turner of Camden | 693 c1416 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I am not necessarily opposed to the amendment, but I do have some questions for its suppor...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-08 18:03:09 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_64927
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_64927
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_64927