Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 6 agreed to. Schedule agreed to. bill reported without amendment.
Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL]
Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Tuesday, 20 March 2007,
in the House of Lords.
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
690 c1204-9 Session
2006-07Legislative stage
Committee stageChamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberRelated items
Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill (HL). Explanatory Notes HL Bill 29-EN also published.
Tuesday, 23 January 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Tuesday, 23 January 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Norton of Louth | 690 c1205 (Link to this contribution)
I support my noble friend’s amendment, which I touched on at Second Reading. On the face of it, an a...
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1204-5 (Link to this contribution)
moved Amendment No. 1:
1: Clause 2 , page 2, line 5, leave out ““Commission””
The noble Lord said...
Show all contributions (15)
Baroness Amos | 690 c1204 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill.
Moved acc...
Lord McNally | 690 c1206 (Link to this contribution)
I support the amendment. I speak as someone who strongly supports the idea of joint operations betwe...
Lord Norton of Louth | 690 c1206 (Link to this contribution)
I support my noble friend’s amendment. I added my name to it because it is a sensible way of address...
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1205-6 (Link to this contribution)
I must first apologise if I appeared to be treating the Lord President as though she were speaking f...
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1206 (Link to this contribution)
moved Amendment No. 2:
2: After Clause 2 , insert the following new Clause—
““Annual report
A join...
Baroness Amos | 690 c1209 (Link to this contribution)
I am happy to say that both Houses would have to be satisfied. That is absolutely the case.
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1208-9 (Link to this contribution)
I acknowledged that, so far as the Bill and the arrangements under it apply only to PICT, this is pr...
Baroness Amos | 690 c1208 (Link to this contribution)
Again, I appreciate and understand the point that the noble Lord seeks to address through the amendm...
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1207-8 (Link to this contribution)
moved Amendment No. 3:
3: Clause 3 , page 2, line 18, leave out ““both”” and insert ““each of the”...
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1207 (Link to this contribution)
I seem to have support in principle from all three major parties in the House. As I confessed when m...
Baroness Amos | 690 c1206-7 (Link to this contribution)
I have some sympathy with the spirit of the amendment proposed. The noble Lord, Lord Cope, is quite ...
Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1209 (Link to this contribution)
That makes my position much easier. As ““both”” seems to mean much the same as ““each””, I beg leave...
Baroness Amos | 690 c1205 (Link to this contribution)
I think that it would be helpful to clarify that this is not a government Bill. I am taking the Bill...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-11 09:41:08 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_62608
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_62608
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_62608