I acknowledged that, so far as the Bill and the arrangements under it apply only to PICT, this is probably not a problem, but it can apply much wider. I had rather hoped that the noble Baroness the Leader of the House would say that ““both Houses”” meant that they both had to be satisfied—each individually. If that were so, my amendment would not be necessary. As matters stand, I am not entirely persuaded.
Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Cope of Berkeley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 March 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c1208-9 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:56:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386448
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386448
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386448