I support my noble friend’s amendment, which I touched on at Second Reading. On the face of it, an asymmetrical relationship between the mechanisms will be adopted for the two Houses. It may be that there are legitimate reasons for that. As I mentioned at Second Reading, it may be a matter for the other House to determine its own procedures, but it would be interesting to tease out the reasoning, so that it is on the record.
Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Norton of Louth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 March 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c1205Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:56:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386438
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386438
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386438