UK Parliament / Open data

European Union (Information, etc.) Bill [HL]

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Thursday, 1 March 2007, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Dykes. The answering member was Baroness Royall of Blaisdon.
European Union (Information, etc.) Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to. Remaining clauses agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

689 c1731-52 

Session

2006-07

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Procedure

Private members' bills proceedings

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Related items

European Union (Information etc) Bill (HL)
Tuesday, 28 November 2006
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Newton of Braintree | 689 c1747 (Link to this contribution) Forgive me; one thing on which I am sure the noble Lord was quite right is that everyone wants to go...
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon | 689 c1748 (Link to this contribution) We recognise the flag just as other member states do. It is the flag of the European Union.

Show all contributions (52)
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1748 (Link to this contribution) How have the Government brought this change into effect when the flag itself does not have legal sta...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1748 (Link to this contribution) I want to give my own view on this and to reassure the noble Lord, Lord Howell, that there is absolu...
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon | 689 c1749 (Link to this contribution) I rise to correct a slip of the tongue I made earlier when I said that the new regulations would com...
Lord Howell of Guildford | 689 c1749 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for clarifying in this short debate where we have got to on this quest...
Lord Cobbold | 689 c1750 (Link to this contribution) The twinning arrangements would and should exist if we were not part of the Union, based on one’s ow...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1750 (Link to this contribution) I am delighted to learn that. We should encourage those initiatives and perhaps give up the twinning...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1752 (Link to this contribution) In that case, I am so delighted to hear that Richmond is twinned with Richmond, Virginia, that I am ...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1751 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in the debate. I remain unrepentant that I thin...
Lord Watson of Richmond | 689 c1752 (Link to this contribution) On a point of clarification, Richmond in Surrey is twinned with Koblenz, with Versailles, and with R...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1750 (Link to this contribution) I hope that this is a convenient moment for me to say that I remain somewhat shocked by the comments...
Lord Monson | 689 c1750-1 (Link to this contribution) I too oppose the clause, albeit for somewhat different reasons from those of the noble Lord, Lord Pe...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1741 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to intervene, but it has been suggested under a monopoly power of proposal by the Commiss...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1740-1 (Link to this contribution) Of course I meant that by definition. I was using shorthand again with a natural desire to save time...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1741-2 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken because they have demonstrated clearly what a Europ...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1742-3 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Lord. No doubt that is something we could consider at the next stage...
Lord Howell of Guildford | 689 c1743 (Link to this contribution) This is the flag-waving clause, and it seems extraordinary. I do not understand how such a clause co...
Lord Cobbold | 689 c1743 (Link to this contribution) I feel that the European Union flag needs an improved status, but I would say that the clause should...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1744 (Link to this contribution) It is a rare pleasure and honour to join the Conservative Front Bench in agreeing on a European matt...
Lord McNally | 689 c1744-5 (Link to this contribution) I suggest that the noble Lord, Lord Howell, takes the Marshalled List home and gets it framed, so th...
Lord Monson | 689 c1745 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord. In that case, he will have to change the word ““shall”” to ““may””....
Lord Dykes | 689 c1745 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord for giving way. There is no question of any compulsion in this sense...
Lord Monson | 689 c1745 (Link to this contribution) I agree with everything that the noble Lords, Lord Howell and Lord Pearson, have said, which is hard...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1746 (Link to this contribution) Quite frankly, I do not know whether he is a Frenchman or not, but the implication was that I might ...
Lord Lea of Crondall | 689 c1746 (Link to this contribution) I am intrigued by the last remark, which drew a very clear distinction between the nation state and ...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1745 (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister gives his reply—and I do not want to prolong the debate—I cannot let the noble L...
Lord McNally | 689 c1745 (Link to this contribution) I made the comparison to an Arsenal manager.
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1746-7 (Link to this contribution) I was just coming to the noble Lord's strictures on the democratic process; but he has again confuse...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1746 (Link to this contribution) No, we love and respect that. But that falls under the history and culture of the nations of Europe,...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1731 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved acc...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1732 (Link to this contribution) Despite my general support for the Bill’s aim of providing more information to the British public ab...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1731-2 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, at end insert ““where indicated by the Secreta...
Lord Howell of Guildford | 689 c1733 (Link to this contribution) I echo the reservations of the Minister on these amendments. I am puzzled over how they reduce, in a...
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon | 689 c1733 (Link to this contribution) It may be helpful if I set out the Government’s position on the amendment. In doing so, I pay tribut...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1733-4 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to noble Lords and to the Minister for their contributions to this argument. I reitera...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1739-40 (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, for proposing this interesting amendment. That d...
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon | 689 c1739 (Link to this contribution) I speak not as a frightened rabbit, but as a member of a Government who are proud to be a member of ...
Lord Watson of Richmond | 689 c1738-9 (Link to this contribution) It is always a pleasure to be engaged in debate with the noble Lord, Lord Pearson. He has always bro...
Lord Cobbold | 689 c1738 (Link to this contribution) By people such as himself and by newspaper journalists who would put the negative case if they belie...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1738 (Link to this contribution) How would the noble Lord ensure that the Euro-sceptic case is put before the British people, if he t...
Lord Cobbold | 689 c1738 (Link to this contribution) Having just stepped off a train from Brussels, I have to say that I am very much in favour of the ma...
Lord Monson | 689 c1737-8 (Link to this contribution) I wholly agree with the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, in his exposé of the farce of the doctrine of subs...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1734-7 (Link to this contribution) moved AmendmentNo. 3: 3: Clause 1, page 1, line 16, at end insert— ““(5) All information provided ...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1740 (Link to this contribution) I wonder whether I might just put the noble Lord straight. It is not a Bill to withdraw from the Eur...
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon | 689 c1747-8 (Link to this contribution) I look forward to debating some of these issues on a future occasion, because they are terribly impo...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 689 c1749-50 (Link to this contribution) Clause 3 encourages twinning between towns in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. As such it is not we...
Lord Dykes | 689 c1741 (Link to this contribution) Again, I think that the noble Lord misunderstands how those mechanisms work. The way in which the Mi...
Lord Monson | 689 c1742 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord for giving way. On the subsection concerning ““to hold no opinion””, the way ...
Lord McNally | 689 c1746 (Link to this contribution) I have been a member of the European movement for 40 years, and I have never hesitated in putting fo...

Subjects

EU law
Information
European Union
Legislation
Flags
Publicity
Public buildings
Town twinning

Legislation

European Union (Information etc) Bill (HL) 2006-07

Link

View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top