Serious Crime Bill (HL). Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
Debate on bills on Wednesday, 7 February 2007,
in the House of Lords,
led by Baroness Scotland of Asthal.
The answering
member was Baroness Anelay of St Johns.
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
689 c727-67 Session
2006-07Legislative stage
Second readingChamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberRelated items
Serious Crime Bill (HL). Explanatory Notes HL Bill 27-EN also published.
Tuesday, 16 January 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Tuesday, 16 January 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Viscount Bledisloe | 689 c750-2 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I speak as a member of your Lordships’ Constitution Committee. Unfortunately, our chairman...
Lord Goodhart | 689 c748-50 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I welcome the Minister back to her place on the Front Bench after what I understand was he...
Show all contributions (18)
Lord Lucas | 689 c746-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I shall concentrate on Part 3 of the Bill, the information-sharing provisions, and try to ...
Baroness Gibson of Market Rasen | 689 c744-5 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, there is no doubt that serious and organised crime has a devastating effect on many of our...
Baroness Anelay of St Johns | 689 c734-8 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the Government clearly have a duty to protect the British public from those who do their u...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c738-41 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, back in 1760, Sir Francis Bernard, the governor of Massachusetts—then a British colony—ado...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c729 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, will the Minister give us an undertaking that that will appear in the Bill?
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 689 c729-34 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the noble Lord knows as well as I do that the reason it will not have to appear in the Bil...
Lord Marlesford | 689 c752-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the speeches that we have heard this afternoon illustrate a justification for the existenc...
Lord Dear | 689 c755-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I share many of the reservations expressed in your Lordships’ House this evening, but the ...
Lord Burnett | 689 c754-5 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I declare an interest: I am a lawyer, but I have never practised in criminal law and I hop...
Lord Dholakia | 689 c758-60 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I endorse the sentiments expressed by my noble friend Lord Goodhart. Perhaps I may say how...
Lord Henley | 689 c760-3 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I follow other noble Lords in welcoming the Minister back to the Dispatch Box to introduce...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 689 c763-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their participation in the debate. I thank most warmly the nob...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 689 c764 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thought that in the McCann case the House of Lords said that the correct test was whethe...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 689 c764-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the reason that the civil test is the appropriate one is that there may be different facto...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 689 c741-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, if I may, I shall confine my remarks to Part 1 and not try to cover the other parts. I wan...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 689 c727-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, before I do anything else, I must offer my abject apology. I was listening to my noble and...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-11 09:40:36 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_61752
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_61752
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_61752