I certainly addressed the point which he generously made praising the Government for our amendments. The point that he raised in relation to the Labour amendment, on the basis that there is no timeframe in the present amendments, is not valid in the Government’s submission, because the Labour amendment itself does not contain any binding requirement on the laying of reports. In our submission, that would remove a level of flexibility. In the area of national security, it is important not to hedge about these kinds of provisions with time requirements. For those reasons, we do not believe that the amendment is necessary. I hope that answers the noble Lord’s question.
National Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Murray of Blidworth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2023.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
828 c340 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-03-02 10:24:00 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-03-01/23030183000031
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-03-01/23030183000031
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-03-01/23030183000031