My Lords, that is one of the reasons why I support what has been said by the noble Lord, Lord Baker, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge. This is not just about a particular Bill; it is about the way we do business. As I am just about to finish my first parliamentary year in this House, and, as other noble Lords have said, a situation of this kind has not arisen before, I would not like to think that this would set a precedent in any way for the way in which the House considers its business in future. When it comes to what I might call negotiating leverage, one day is a derisory offer to the House; with no disrespect to the Minister, that is not good enough. There is great merit in not agreeing to allow a date for Third Reading to be set at this stage.
Schools Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Stansgate
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 July 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Schools Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c1763 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-07-29 13:04:03 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/22071830000015
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/22071830000015
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/22071830000015