My Lords, I rise to support Amendment 445, which I was also pleased to sign. The noble Lord, Lord Hunt, made a very good case for why it would be so useful for charities and the noble Lord, Lord Aberdare, extended that. I wish to extend it further to reinforce the point that the importance of the pipeline notice is that it provides guidance for the authorities to take a risk that, in a sense, goes slightly beyond the principle that no one got fired for choosing IBM. If we are trying to get the best service, we must look for the right opportunities and the right people, not just in the context of charities, or even small businesses. Those especially penalised are microbusinesses, freelancers or even start-ups in the commercial sector, not-for-profits and social enterprises. All are massively disadvantaged by tendering for any contract. Many have more than enough skill to be able to do it, and many of the people who provide the backbone for those areas are people who accomplished it very comfortably in larger companies. The effective use of pipeline notices is a strong signal that the Government expect all contracting authorities to make a judgment that will help all those sorts of businesses and those people who can provide excellent and outstanding service. They deserve the opportunity to do so.
Procurement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mendelsohn
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 July 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Procurement Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c553GC Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-10-04 16:17:36 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/22071827000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/22071827000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/22071827000004