In saying that mobile operators are very large and substantial companies, does the noble Lord accept that only part of what they do fulfils the same sort of social benefit commonly associated with a traditional utility company? A very large amount of what they do and propose to do is the selling of very large amounts of bulk data for all sorts of commercial purposes, not least streaming information to parts of the entertainment business. Why is the claim made that they should be treated in the same way as a utility, when a data centre, battery storage facility or even a wind or solar farm would not qualify in the same way? I put it to him that some of the arguments put forward, and which appear to have influenced government, do not stand up to scrutiny.
Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Lytton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 June 2022.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c683 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-03 10:43:44 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-29/22062976000001
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-29/22062976000001
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-29/22062976000001