I agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Dodds, said about Amendment 40, which I co-signed. It is primarily a probing amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Dobbs, made the point that if the Bill goes through unamended, it is extremely important that this House and the House of Commons are able to probe exactly why the Secretary of State has deemed something to be appropriate. “Appropriate” is a very subjective term, and it is not sufficient just to lay orders before Parliament. It is important that it is fleshed out, discussed, debated and aired. I agree with the earlier comment about some of the statements in this House and in the House of Commons not always being sufficient. If the Bill goes through unamended, it is important that there is some form of parliamentary scrutiny of why the Secretary of State has taken these measures because he or she has deemed them to be appropriate.
Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Suttie
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 June 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c106GC Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-07-18 10:16:29 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-22/2206237000082
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-22/2206237000082
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-22/2206237000082