The noble Lord will know from his time in Government that the law officers provide confidential legal advice to Ministers. I can only say to him that I am personally satisfied that this six-month period is appropriate. We are taking a severe step with this legislation; we are retrospectively interfering with property rights. Whether the legislation has been flagged in advance—I think David Cameron first promised it in 2015—does not, as I understand it, alter the legal case that somebody who wished to purchase expensive legal help to challenge the legislation would be able to do so under the Human Rights Act. I can do no more than assure the noble Lord that the officials and I are acting under the legal advice that we have received about the appropriate period. I can assure him that I wish to bring this in as quickly as I can. He will be aware that the Government originally proposed a period of 18 months. Following fairly significant political pressure, we have taken further advice and have managed to reduce it to six months. I am seriously concerned that, if we reduced it further, we could be subject to legal challenge. I am happy to speak to him outside the House.
Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Callanan
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 March 2022.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
820 c78 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-03-15 12:27:36 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-03-14/22031465000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-03-14/22031465000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-03-14/22031465000004