My Lords, I too support this amendment; I did at Second Reading. Indeed, I have added my name to the amendment but too late for it to appear on the fifth Marshalled List. The case for it could hardly be simpler or more compelling. Frankly, the illustration of the scooter helmet from the noble Lord, Lord Bach, ought of itself to be enough to carry this. I am against absolutism and total purity and inflexibility routinely, but flexibility and discretion are almost invariably required to be welcomed and valued, and they are here. It is nothing short of bizarre, absurd and conspicuously unfair to single out this one public office as one from which people are uniquely disqualified in the circumstances already sufficiently indicated. I need not waste another word. My only regret is that the amendment is not being put to the vote.
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 January 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
817 c1137 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-01-24 12:40:43 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-01-12/22011274000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-01-12/22011274000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-01-12/22011274000004