Before we hear from the Minister and the noble Lord for the Opposition, I shall simply add that of course the aims identified in this amendment are probably shared by everybody in your Lordships’ House but, ultimately, is it not for the Government of the day to decide on these things? I think we can probably predict what most royal commissions would recommend following the terms of reference reflecting this amendment. Ultimately, a Government have to decide whether in certain circumstances, as was the case in the Bill, there need to be mandatory sentences or the prison estate needs more money spent on it. These are matters for government. I will be interested to hear what the noble Lord for the Opposition says about this; during the course of the Bill, I do not think the Labour Party has opposed the increased mandatory sentences in various areas. That is a position it is entitled to take. A royal commission can recommend; a Government have to decide.
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Faulks
(Non-affiliated)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 January 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
817 c1104 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-01-24 12:40:30 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-01-12/22011260000036
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-01-12/22011260000036
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-01-12/22011260000036