My Lords, these amendments are all about which specific public authorities should have the power to grant criminal conduct authorisations. Frankly, I disagree with my noble friend Lord Cormack and the noble Lord, Lord Dubs. I see no need to be restrictive; all sorts of public authorities may need to use the sort of, in effect, facilities to use criminal conduct authorisations. In addition to the list here, how about the Civil Aviation Authority? One knows—and I am deeply involved in civil aviation matters—that that area is riddled with challenges of illegality. The same applies to Customs and Excise, and so on. Surely the issue is not who should have the power, but deciding, after a thorough assessment of need, who is the most relevant and has the right expertise. Otherwise it becomes a bureaucratic nightmare, rather than a carefully planned and executed operation.
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Naseby
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 January 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
809 c839 Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-30 09:57:48 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-01-13/21011355000025
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-01-13/21011355000025
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-01-13/21011355000025