My Lords, I want to make a point on Amendment 77 on journalistic sources, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Whitaker. As I mentioned to my noble friend last week, Parliament already has an effective equivalent to judicial review. I referred to the Economist case of 1975, when the House of Commons Committee of Privileges imposed a personal penalty on the editor and a journalist—who happened to be me—of the Economist due to the premature publication of the draft report of the Select Committee on a Wealth Tax and our refusal to reveal our sources. The House of Commons debated this on the Floor of the Chamber for more than two hours and voted not to impose the penalty.
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Marlesford
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 December 2020.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
808 c653 Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-29 22:28:55 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-12-01/20120149000025
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-12-01/20120149000025
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-12-01/20120149000025