There may of course be incidental policy issues that arise when we come to draw down into domestic law an obligation, or obligations, undertaken at the level of international law. Clearly, in circumstances where there were policy choices to be made, a Government would consult upon those matters to bring forward policy choices that were acceptable to stakeholders. If they were not acceptable to Parliament, even after consultation, Parliament would not pass the affirmative SI in question. I do not accept that it is necessary in each and every instance to bring forward primary legislation for this purpose. In those exceptional cases where there may be consequential issues to be addressed, clearly they will be addressed at policy level. They will be consulted upon and the matter brought forward. The Government will not bring forward a policy proposal for an incidental measure without realising that Parliament would be prepared to accept it. That would be a pointless exercise.
Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Keen of Elie
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 May 2020.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
803 c728 Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-26 21:33:17 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-05-13/20051316000059
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-05-13/20051316000059
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-05-13/20051316000059