I just want to amplify the point made by the noble Baroness, Lady Altmann. Those of us who have been around in government for some years know that the announcement of review reports in Budgets do not necessarily mean that anything in those reviews will be rapidly implemented. My suspicion would be that any such reviews would have a longish period of consultation and would not appear in the next finance Bill—that is a likely outcome. Building on what the noble Baroness said, I need to go back to my clients—if I may put it that way—who will want to know what the position is. If I prove to be right over what happens on 11 March, would the Government be willing to consider something along the lines of buying two to three years for the NHS doctors? Will they help me get the wording right, so that it does not fall into the elephant traps that the Minister has set out? When we get to Report, we cannot just leave this; we have to come back to this issue with some credible solution. I would be delighted if the announcement on 11 March delivered a quick response, but if we do not deliver a response that covers the next two financial years, we will put the NHS in great peril.
Pension Schemes Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Warner
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 March 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Pension Schemes Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
802 c326GC Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-27 14:45:17 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-03-04/20030452000011
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-03-04/20030452000011
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-03-04/20030452000011