My Lords, I support Amendment 19. I cannot think of anything I can say that would improve on what the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, has said, so I shall not say it. However, when the Government look at their own amendment and the very helpful way in which they have reconsidered this rather urgently introduced provision in the House of Commons, they should consider whether new subsections (1), (2) and (3) run in the right order. New Section 58B(1) sets outs the offence; new subsection (3), or proposed new subsections (3A), (3B), (3C) and (3D) are not offences; and new subsection (2) sets out the defence. Logically, it might be better and easier—and it might deal with the sui generis point raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee—if the order ran new subsection (1), the current new subsection (3) and then new subsection (2).
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Judge
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 December 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
794 c857 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-28 13:46:29 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-12-03/18120326000023
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-12-03/18120326000023
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-12-03/18120326000023