My Lords, I agree with both noble Lords. The amendment seems to be common sense. As the noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich, said, while Section 118(2) places the burden of proof on the prosecution to disprove the reasonable excuse, you have to hunt pretty far to find it. Currently it does appear, if one takes an ordinary, common-sense meaning from what the legislation says, that the burden is actually reversed.
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Paddick
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 December 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
794 c846 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-28 13:46:26 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-12-03/18120313000032
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-12-03/18120313000032
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-12-03/18120313000032