My Lords, I, too, support the amendment. I find it shocking that the Home Office should be continuing the proscription of organisations which it recognises do not satisfy the statutory criteria. I have only one suggestion to those who tabled the amendment for their consideration for Report. In new paragraph (d), should it not require the Minister to publish not simply each such decision but the basic reasons for such a decision? That would add a further level of accountability and discipline of the secretary of state in this context.
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Pannick
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 November 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c1752 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-11-28 11:45:54 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111248000081
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111248000081
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111248000081