My Lords, it is very simple really, is it not? We spent time in Committee rightly debating the problems of trying to criminalise expressions of opinion or belief and identifying that a proscribed organisation should be one that none of us should support or encourage. Fine. The essence of the problem, however, is this. We should be allowed to express opinions and beliefs about organisations which are not proscribed. That is elementary, and this House will not need a disquisition for me about the importance of being able to do so. The problem is this. We are not in a position to express opinions about organisations which are currently proscribed which should no longer be proscribed or whose proscription should have been removed years ago. That is an affront to the rule of law, and I therefore support the amendment.
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Judge
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 November 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c1751 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-11-28 11:45:54 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111248000075
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111248000075
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111248000075