On Amendment 65A, as I understand it, the Government are not arguing that the amendment in any way compromises the position of the security agencies, but would make clear in the Bill that such considerations need to be taken into account. They have been written into the draft guidance. What is the objection to putting them into the Bill in place of the current wording, which looks a bit like a random stop and search?
Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rosser
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 November 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c1703 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-11-28 11:45:50 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111217000089
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111217000089
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-12/18111217000089