I thank the Minister and the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, for those comments. I am grateful for the Minister’s reassurance. The situation that we envisaged is that there would be more than one certificate and more than one item that looked similar in the market. There would then be the problem of identifying which was the original and which was the fake. As we develop our exemption certificate regime, I can imagine that they will have some kudos abroad. They will not just be used for enforcement under our regime but could give some additional value to properties that are traded in other countries as proof of the item being of the highest quality and so forth. I would like to look a little more at the Minister’s comments, but I will not pursue this any further today so I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Ivory Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 September 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Ivory Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
792 c2143 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-11-14 13:56:50 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-09-10/18091035000020
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-09-10/18091035000020
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-09-10/18091035000020