My Lords, I am obliged to my noble friend Lord Hodgson for his amendment. I understand the intent when we are seeking to address a very particular problem. However, I cannot concur with the proposal that we should set in the Bill some limit to the judicial discretion that will be exercised in exceptional circumstances. We have yet to see how exceptional circumstances will develop once the Bill comes into effect. We therefore consider it more appropriate that the percentage increase in tariff should be determined by regulation by the Lord Chancellor in order that he may, from time to time, have regard to developments once the Act is in force. We do not consider it appropriate to constrain that exercise by setting a ceiling in the Bill. For these reasons, I invite my noble friend to withdraw his amendment.
Civil Liability Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Keen of Elie
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 May 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Civil Liability Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
791 c329 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-10-17 12:28:04 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000438
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000438
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000438