I think this is a misunderstanding. I was not trying to imply that there was an element of certainty involved here. I simply wanted to know how the figures had been arrived at. Why not some other figure? Instead of 235, why not 200? Why not 400? How were these figures arrived at?
Civil Liability Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sharkey
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 May 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Civil Liability Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
791 c312Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-10-17 12:27:58 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000349
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000349
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000349