UK Parliament / Open data

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Judge (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 April 2018. It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.

My Lords, I want to add my voice and underline, if I may, how serious the issue arising under subsections (3) to (7) is. There are many executives that would be desperately pleased to have provisions

such as these in primary legislation. There is no reason whatever why Parliament should not be able to deal with any issue arising in the context of sentient animals—there is no exclusion about that. However, to exclude the possibility of somebody seeking a remedy before the court would be an astonishingly dangerous principle to put into any legislation. The fact that it arises in this very sensitive issue relating to animals is one thing, but a lot of citizens, and individuals who happen to live in this country, rely on the possibility of taking the Government or the local authority to court to make them account for the exercise of, or failure to exercise, their powers. This would set an alarming precedent.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

790 c1619 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Subjects

Back to top