UK Parliament / Open data

Nuclear Safeguards Bill

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Thursday, 22 February 2018, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Henley.
Lords committee stage first day. New clause debated and withdrawn. Another new clause not moved. Part 1 of 2.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

789 cc282-305 

Session

2017-19

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Nuclear Safeguards Bill 2017-19. Brought from the Commons.
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
Bills
House of Lords
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee thirteenth report.
Wednesday, 7 February 2018
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2018-0113
Thursday, 22 February 2018
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Nuclear Safeguards Bill
Thursday, 22 February 2018
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Featherstone | 789 c282 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Featherstone

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

Baroness Featherstone | 789 cc282-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am sure that the Minister, in listening to the Second Reading debate in this House, c...


Show all contributions (48)
Lord Warner | 789 cc283-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendments 2, 12 and 16, which are in my name in this group. We had a ...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 c286 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall refer to the amendments tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Featherstone, and th...

Lord Teverson | 789 c286 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Viscount for letting me intervene, but I honestly do not understand that. If Eu...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 c286 (Link to this contribution)

Euratom is certainly approved by the IAEA as having adequate standards. My point is that Euratom ...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 cc286-7 (Link to this contribution)

Could I not continue, because I have just been interrupted? I will perhaps give way to the noble ...

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 789 c287 (Link to this contribution)

I just want to come back to the noble Viscount’s key point, which is that IAEA standards are less...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 c287 (Link to this contribution)

I wholly agree, as I think I said, that the right way is to continue to rely on Euratom until suc...

Baroness Featherstone | 789 c287 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Viscount for giving way. Is he aware that the Government’s declared intention i...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 c288 (Link to this contribution)

I am well aware that the Government have explained that their policy is to meet Euratom standards...

Lord Warner | 789 c288 (Link to this contribution)

Before the Minister sits down—

Lord Warner | 789 c288 (Link to this contribution)

Well, I am sure the noble Viscount is in the Prime Minister’s thoughts for ministerial office. I ...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 c288 (Link to this contribution)

I am saying that I believe it is not possible by March 2019 to achieve the necessary nuclear co-o...

Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan | 789 c288 (Link to this contribution)

Before the noble Viscount sits down, will he clarify something? He sought to give us reassurance ...

Viscount Trenchard | 789 c288 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am not sufficiently aware of the detail of the proportions of different types of isot...

Lord Teverson | 789 cc288-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I think we should allow the noble Viscount to sit down, and remind ourselves that he is...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 789 cc289-290 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, after the excellent introduction by the noble Baroness, Lady Featherstone, and the exce...

Lord Hutton of Furness | 789 cc290-2 (Link to this contribution)

I will intervene very briefly to express my support for the amendments that my noble friend Lord ...

Lord Broers | 789 cc292-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I compliment the noble Lord, Lord Hutton, on making clear from the industry’s point of ...

Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan | 789 cc293-4 (Link to this contribution)

I am very pleased to follow the last two speakers, because I have had associations with both of t...

Lord Fox | 789 c294 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, noble Lords have heard about the scale of the risk of not achieving the objective of th...

Baroness Neville-Rolfe | 789 cc294-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have some sympathy for the questions raised in this debate and I start by associating...

Viscount Hanworth | 789 cc295-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, these amendments propose an associate membership of Euratom. In effect, they propose a ...

Lord Northbrook | 789 c296 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I apologise to the House for not being able to take part at Second Reading. I have some...

Lord Rooker | 789 c296 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have a couple of questions for the Minister before he replies. First, will he answer ...

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 789 cc297-8 (Link to this contribution)

We had an extensive debate on the principle of Euratom last night and I shall not repeat what I s...

Lord Henley | 789 c298 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am not sure whether I heard the noble Lord set out his own party’s policy more widely...

Lord Henley | 789 cc298-300 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord knows that he always gets wisdom from me. I want also to say that I am not necessa...

Lord Fox | 789 c300 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, perhaps I missed them, but what are the long-term arrangements that have already been e...

Lord Henley | 789 c300 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, will the noble Lord bear with me? I said that I was going to play a fairly long innings...

Lord Warner | 789 c300 (Link to this contribution)

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, but can he say what discussions have actually taken place w...

Lord Henley | 789 c300 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, discussions have already taken place with the IAEA. We will continue with those discuss...

Lord Warner | 789 c300 (Link to this contribution)

I understand what the Minister is saying, but none of us has moved amendments this morning that i...

Lord Henley | 789 cc300-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am sorry if the noble Lord feels that he is not a slow learner. At times, I have felt...

Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan | 789 c302 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister referred to Article 206 and the agreement that has been arrived at with Switzerland ...

Lord Henley | 789 c302 (Link to this contribution)

My understanding is that it will allow them to do that. I am not aware that Article 206 could be ...

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath | 789 c302 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister is being very helpful. It is the first explanation we have had as to why the Governm...

Lord Warner | 789 c302 (Link to this contribution)

Can I amplify something from what the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, said? If the Minister looks at my Am...

Lord Henley | 789 cc302-4 (Link to this contribution)

I was coming to the noble Lord’s amendment to make quite clear our ambitions for that future rela...

Lord Rooker | 789 c304 (Link to this contribution)

In that case, are we not all wasting our time? Could the Minister say whether the International A...

Lord Henley | 789 c305 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord never wastes his time, nor does he waste the time of the Committee, but I can give...

Baroness Featherstone | 789 c305 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister. I listened carefully to his arguments in response to the amendments. I thin...

Lord Warner | 789 c305 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord Warner

2: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Rev...

Lord Warner | 789 c305 (Link to this contribution)

I listened carefully to what the Minister said. I did not hear anything which suggested that ther...

Back to top