The noble Lord never wastes his time, nor does he waste the time of the Committee, but I can give an assurance that discussions continue with the IAEA, which is perfectly happy that we will be able to meet the appropriate safeguards regime to meet its standards by March next year. We will discuss that on later amendments. Processes have taken place in the ONR and it is engaged in recruitment. We will meet its standards—standards similar to those met by the Americans as fellow members of the IAEA. All that will be in place; that is the point behind the Bill. It is why I do not think these amendments are necessary—we will no doubt discuss them in much greater detail on Report. I hope that the noble Lord and the noble Baroness, Lady Featherstone, who is about to respond, will be happy and feel able not to press their amendments.
Nuclear Safeguards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 22 February 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Nuclear Safeguards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
789 c305 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-03-01 12:05:13 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-22/18022242000235
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-22/18022242000235
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-22/18022242000235