My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendment 26. Amendment 25 would replace “may” with “must”, which would make it consistent with other places in the Bill. Amendment 26 is the real substance and raises a new requirement to notify a designated person once relevant sanction regulations have been made. If a sanction is made, thereafter the individual would have to be notified that it has been made against them. They must also be given a reason for the sanction having been made, under procedural fairness. The legislation contains rights of appeal and review, but how can you appeal or review something you do not know about, or do so if you do not know the reasons for it? That seems a justification for this amendment. What actions are necessary to address the concerns which have led to their designation? On that basis, we invite the Minister to consider whether this is an appropriate amendment to be accepted into the Bill.
Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lennie
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 November 2017.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
787 c147 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-04-16 11:32:03 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-21/171121127000173
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-21/171121127000173
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-21/171121127000173