My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for her reply. I tabled my amendment for two reasons: the first from conviction, and the second to ensure that I could secure the fullest possible statement from the Government on Report. I recognise that ownership is being transferred to the DWP. I consider that to be very positive, first, because of its remit and experience; and secondly, because it has an alignment of interest over its own database, which is the state database. The Minister has already confirmed that the Bill would not preclude having a public governor of the single financial guidance body if that was the policy decision. In her statement, she has quite clearly said that the Government accept that the dashboard must be of use to individuals; that consumers must be at the heart of the design; that it has to be viable, and that the framework of governance must hold public confidence. The Minister referred to a report being produced in spring next year, and I recognise that there is a lot of work to be done, but I think she can assume that there will certainly be several Members of this House who will be looking to scrutinise what the Government say in the report. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Drake
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 October 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
785 c879 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-11-22 15:55:32 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-24/17102436000039
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-24/17102436000039
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-24/17102436000039