Moved by
Viscount Younger of Leckie
116: After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Grant, variation or revocation of authorisation: advice on quality etc
(1) The OfS must request advice from the relevant body regarding the quality of, or the standards applied to, higher education provided by a provider before making—
(a) an order under section 41(1) authorising the provider to grant taught awards or research awards,
(b) a further order under section 41(1)—
(i) varying an authorisation given to the provider by a previous order under section 41(1), or
(ii) revoking such an authorisation on the ground that condition B in section 43(4) is satisfied, or
(c) an order under section 44(1)—
(i) varying an authorisation given to the provider, as described in that provision, to grant taught awards or research awards, or
(ii) revoking such an authorisation on the ground that condition B in section 44(5A) is satisfied.
(2) In this section “the relevant body” means—
(a) the designated assessment body, or
(b) if there is no such body, a committee which the OfS must establish under paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 for the purpose of performing the functions of the relevant body under this section.
(3) Where the OfS requests advice under subsection (1), the relevant body must provide it.
(4) The advice provided by the relevant body must be informed by the views of persons who (between them) have experience of—
(a) providing higher education on behalf of, or being responsible for the provision of higher education by—
(i) an English higher education provider which is neither authorised to grant taught awards nor authorised to grant research awards,
(ii) an English further education provider, and
(iii) an English higher education provider which is within neither sub-paragraph (i) nor sub-paragraph (ii),
(b) representing or promoting the interests of individual students, or students generally, on higher education courses provided by higher education providers,
(c) employing graduates of higher education courses provided by higher education providers,
(d) research into science, technology, humanities or new ideas, and
(e) encouraging competition in industry or another sector of society.
(5) Where the order authorises the provider to grant research awards or varies or revokes such an authorisation, the advice provided by the relevant body must also be informed by the views of UKRI.
(6) Subsections (4) and (5) do not prevent the advice given by the relevant body also being informed by the views of others.
(7) The OfS must have regard to advice provided to it by the relevant body under subsection (3) in deciding whether to make the order.
(8) But that does not prevent the OfS having regard to advice from others regarding quality or standards.
(9) Where the order varies or revokes an authorisation, the advice under subsection (1) may be requested before or after the governing body of the provider is notified under section 45 of the OfS’s intention to make the order.
(10) Where there are one or more sector-recognised standards, for the purposes subsections (1) and (8)—
(a) the advice regarding the standards applied must be advice regarding the standards applied in respect of matters for which there are sector-recognised standards, and
(b) that advice must be regarding those standards as assessed against sector-recognised standards.
(11) In this section—
“designated assessment body” means a body for the time being designated under Schedule 4;
“humanities” and “science” have the same meaning as in Part 3 (see section 107).”