UK Parliament / Open data

Policing and Crime Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Chesterton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 December 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.

My Lords, I support the amendment tabled by my noble friend. I speak as a scientist. I tabled a Question some eight or nine years ago about when there are scientific questions in a legal case and lots of money is spent by the Crown on some prosecution and little or zero money is available for the defence. It would be more appropriate, as in many civil cases, to have some sharing between the two sides of the nature of the scientific study and the interpretation of the data. When that does not happen—for example, it did not in the case of R v Sion Jenkins—you get serious miscarriages of justice and lots of money being spent: £10 million, I think, in that case. This amendment is very important.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

777 c758 

Session

2016-17

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Subjects

Back to top