My Lords, I support the amendment tabled by my noble friend. I speak as a scientist. I tabled a Question some eight or nine years ago about when there are scientific questions in a legal case and lots of money is spent by the Crown on some prosecution and little or zero money is available for the defence. It would be more appropriate, as in many civil cases, to have some sharing between the two sides of the nature of the scientific study and the interpretation of the data. When that does not happen—for example, it did not in the case of R v Sion Jenkins—you get serious miscarriages of justice and lots of money being spent: £10 million, I think, in that case. This amendment is very important.
Policing and Crime Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hunt of Chesterton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 December 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
777 c758 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-13 15:49:00 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-12-07/16120773000116
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-12-07/16120773000116
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-12-07/16120773000116