UK Parliament / Open data

Policing and Crime Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 November 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.

I am grateful to the Minister. I am still struggling to understand why a police and crime commissioner, who is elected on the basis of a manifesto to do with policing, should have full voting rights on a fire and rescue authority. I am not sure that “It would be a great shame” is a particularly powerful argument against. The Minister said that the police and crime commissioner should be on an equal footing with other members of the fire and rescue authority but did not actually say why. Yes, the final decision rests with the fire and rescue authority but, given the fact that this is in legislation, it would be difficult, certainly following the Minister’s remarks, for fire and rescue authorities to resist a move by a police and crime commissioner to take those voting rights. Greater collaboration surely does not necessarily depend on the police and crime commissioner having a vote on the fire and rescue authority. None the less, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

777 c220 

Session

2016-17

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Subjects

Back to top