My concern was that “or elsewhere” might be used in cases involving foreign ships which are discovered within our territorial waters to contain, or are suspected to contain, refugees and others in need of international protection who might be in breach of immigration law but who nevertheless have certain rights which, on the face of it, could be overridden if there was a power to divert ships to a port elsewhere—indeed, anywhere in the world. It could mean their being sent back to a place where they would be in danger. It would also mean that they would not have had the right to have their claim for protection fairly determined before they could be returned. The question I was asking is, was my interpretation of the apparent power in the Bill for a law enforcement officer or the Secretary of State to be able to do that correct? If it was not correct—and I said I hoped it was not correct—will the Government explain to me why my analysis was not right?
Policing and Crime Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rosser
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Policing and Crime Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c726 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-01-11 16:33:56 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-02/16110260000088
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-02/16110260000088
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-02/16110260000088