My Lords, there is a fairly simple explanation for this. An authority that has already transferred its stock, as the noble Lord, Lord True, has talked about, is in a good position, because it will not pay the levy. If, on the other hand, an authority would like, in the future, to transfer its stock, it will still pay the levy. I have an amendment later which seeks to remove that particular provision. It seems quite extraordinary that an authority cannot, in the future, transfer stock, but if it has transferred it, it will escape any levy. That seems to me to be an imbalance that we need to address.
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kerslake
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 March 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c1435 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-13 16:38:27 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-10/16031034000199
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-10/16031034000199
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-10/16031034000199