My Lords, I share the concerns of the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig. I am particularly concerned about putting retired servicemen in the frame again after there has been a judicial inquiry. It might be that a subsequent judicial inquiry comes to a different conclusion, but once you have had a judicial inquiry and no prosecutions have arisen, servicemen ought to be able to carry on with their duties, retire and not worry about further legal action; they should not be worrying about further legal action for the rest of their natural lives. I very much support the general thrust of his amendment, therefore, but perhaps it needs some more tests—in particular, in relation to the case we are obviously talking about but not mentioning, that there has been a judicial inquiry.
Armed Forces Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Attlee
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 3 March 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Armed Forces Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c149GC Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-26 12:04:38 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-03/16030357000010
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-03/16030357000010
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-03/16030357000010