My Lords, when the noble Lord, Lord Touhig, moved his amendment, he said that it was a probing amendment. However, I support the general position and tone of my noble friend’s response. He mentioned the Reserve Forces (Safeguard of Employment) Act. I must say that post-Operation TELIC, the MoD’s support for reservists who found themselves in difficulties was absolutely pathetic. Reservists were on their own. I used to fondly think that if I found myself in difficulty I would have the big bad main-building MoD on my side. The reality was that reservists got no support from the Ministry of Defence at all. They had the protection of the legislation, but they had to fight the case on their own. Whereas if the MoD had rung up to say, “This is the Ministry of Defence, why aren’t you re-engaging the reservists?”, it would have saved an awful lot of difficulty. But the MoD was, frankly, pathetic. It is not the Minister’s fault, but that is what happened after TELIC.
Armed Forces Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Attlee
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 March 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Armed Forces Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c83GC Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-26 12:04:38 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-01/16030220000199
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-01/16030220000199
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-01/16030220000199