I am finding difficult the suggestion that there is now some prescription that direct debit is the only method that should be used. Putting aside the issue of choice and the fact that direct debit does not appear at all in the Bill as a solution, I would like to give an example and get the Minister’s view on the following: in the Government’s evidence about the propensity of people to use payday lenders, one of the extraordinary features of those people who have very little who use payday lenders was that they remove direct debits from their bank account so as not to suffer the penalties as a consequence of it. Many of those were low-paid workers and will have been in the public sector. In those circumstances, where it is better to have this deducted at source when the money comes in rather than having an impact on their bank account where there may be a detriment, should those people not have a choice as to where and how they should be able to pay their union deductions?
Trade Union Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mendelsohn
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 25 February 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Trade Union Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c430 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-02-29 16:43:49 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-02-25/16022541000242
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-02-25/16022541000242
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-02-25/16022541000242