UK Parliament / Open data

Welfare Reform and Work Bill

Debate on bills on Monday, 25 January 2016, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Freud and Baroness Evans of Bowes Park.
Lords report stage first day. Part 3 of 3.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

768 cc1114-1142 

Session

2015-16

Legislative stage

Report stage

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee thirteenth report.
Wednesday, 18 November 2015
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Welfare Reform and Work Bill 2015-16. As amended in Committee (HL).
Tuesday, 12 January 2016
Bills
House of Lords
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee nineteenth report.
Wednesday, 20 January 2016
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Welfare Reform and Work Bill
Monday, 25 January 2016
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Show all related items (5)
Deposited Paper DEP2016-0104
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
Deposited papers
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Lister of Burtersett | 768 c1114 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Lister of Burtersett

25: Clause 7, page 9, leave out lines 7 to 10<...

Baroness Lister of Burtersett | 768 cc1114-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 25 would remove child benefit and child tax credits from the benefit cap. I r...


Show all contributions (44)
Baroness Sherlock | 768 cc1118-1120 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lady Lister for the way she has introduced the amendment and fo...

Lord Freud | 768 cc1120-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 25 seeks to remove child benefit and child tax credit from the list of those ...

Baroness Lister of Burtersett | 768 c1122 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lady Sherlock and to the Minister. I never received th...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1122 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Hollis of Heigham

26: Clause 7, page 9, leave out lines 15 and 16

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 cc1122-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, guardian’s allowance is not separately listed in the Chancellor’s Excel sheets of benef...

Baroness Sherlock | 768 c1125 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the amendment would exclude guardian’s allowance from the cap. I shall briefly set out ...

Lord Freud | 768 cc1125-6 (Link to this contribution)

Amendment 26 seeks to remove guardian’s allowance from the list of those that are included within...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1126 (Link to this contribution)

First, I thank my noble friend who spelled out the devastating situation in which these children ...

Lord Freud | 768 c1126 (Link to this contribution)

No, I am not in a position to reconsider at this stage.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1127 (Link to this contribution)

What does that mean—“at this stage”? Is the Minister willing to come back at Third Reading with a...

Lord Freud | 768 c1127 (Link to this contribution)

Regrettably, as I said, I am not in a position to make any kind of commitment.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1127 (Link to this contribution)

I guess it is my fault. I should have brought this up in Committee and perhaps given the Minister...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1127 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Hollis of Heigham

26A: Clause 7, page 9, line 37, at end insert—

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 cc1127-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment relates to a situation that we touched on earlier, when we were debating...

Baroness Sherlock | 768 cc1129-1130 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment, in the name of my noble friend Lady Hollis, would exempt from the cap w...

Lord Freud | 768 c1130 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as I have already set out, those with a sustained work history benefit from a nine-mont...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1130 (Link to this contribution)

I thank my noble friend Lady Sherlock. The Minister’s answer is that if a woman has a partner, he...

Lord Freud | 768 c1131 (Link to this contribution)

One of the things we have tested rather thoroughly through the courts is the role of discretionar...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1131 (Link to this contribution)

In that case, why do such women not fall within the Government’s guidelines as having high priori...

Lord Freud | 768 c1131 (Link to this contribution)

I just want to make the point that DHPs can be used for the long term. They are not just a tempor...

Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 768 c1131 (Link to this contribution)

I do not know how many local authorities the Minister has spoken to about their use of DHPs, but ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1132 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

27: Clause 7, page 9, line 39, at end insert—

“...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 cc1132-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 27 stands in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Sherlock. This is also ...

Lord Freud | 768 cc1133-4 (Link to this contribution)

Amendment 27 seeks to exempt people in temporary accommodation from the benefit cap. I do not agr...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1134 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for his reply. None of it was a surprise, and I will, of course, withdraw th...

Lord Freud | 768 c1134 (Link to this contribution)

One of the most worrying aspects about temporary accommodation is that many cases have not been t...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1134 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister for that. I will read the record, but I am not sure that I would ag...

Lord Freud | 768 c1134 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Freud

28: Clause 7, page 9, line 41, at end insert—

“(b) in subse...

Lord Freud | 768 c1135 (Link to this contribution)

The Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee recommended in its report of 23 November a n...

Baroness Sherlock | 768 c1135 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that explanation. We welcome the move to affirmative regulatio...

Lord Freud | 768 c1136 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Freud

29: Clause 8, page 11, line 21, leave out from “subsection” to “m...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1136 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

31: Clause 9, page 11, line 32, leave out from “to” t...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 cc1136-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 31 in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Sherlock, I shall sp...

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein | 768 cc1137-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support Amendments 31, 33 and 34 in the names of my noble friends Lady Sherlock and L...

Baroness Evans of Bowes Park | 768 cc1139-1140 (Link to this contribution)

I thank noble Lords for tabling these amendments. I do not wish to spend too much time restating ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1140 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her response. If the Government are to be in surplus in ...

Baroness Evans of Bowes Park | 768 c1140 (Link to this contribution)

As I said in relation to the disability element, we have exempted quite a number of elements from...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1140 (Link to this contribution)

Is that it? Given the hour I think there is no point in pursuing this, except to ask whether, on ...

Baroness Evans of Bowes Park | 768 c1140 (Link to this contribution)

As I have said, we are protecting certain elements of disability benefits. We understand the need...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 768 c1141 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we are clearly not going to make much further progress this evening. In the circumstanc...

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein | 768 c1141 (Link to this contribution)

Tabled by

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein

32: Clause 9, page 11, line 33, at end insert—

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein | 768 c1142 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, like my noble friend Lord McKenzie of Luton I find it deeply disappointing that the Gov...

Back to top